--- description: Busca información actualizada sobre GitHub en GetApp Chile. Lee opiniones verificadas y descubre sus funciones, características, precios y usabilidad. Compara GitHub con productos similares hasta encontrar la opción adecuada. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: GitHub: precios, funciones y opiniones | GetApp Chile 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de seguimiento de problemas](/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) > [GitHub](/software/90537/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.getapp.cl/software/90537/github Page: 1 / 247\ Siguiente: [Next page](https://www.getapp.cl/software/90537/github?page=2) > GitHub es un lugar para compartir código con amigos, compañeros de trabajo, compañeros de clase y desconocidos. Ayuda a individuos y equipos a escribir más rápido y mejor. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6147 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Calificación | Detail | | **En general** | **4.8/5** | 6147 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funciones | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Microsoft - **Ubicación**: Redmond, EE. UU. - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Precio inicial**: US$4,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Free version available) (Prueba gratis) - **Target Audience**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Available Countries**: Alemania, Arabia Saudita, Australia, Austria, Bielorrusia, Brasil, Bulgaria, Bélgica, Canadá, China, Corea del Sur, Croacia, Dinamarca, Egipto, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Finlandia, Francia, Hungría and 27 more ## Funciones - @menciones - Análisis de vulnerabilidades - Autenticación - Automated Testing - Autorizaciones basadas en roles - Búsqueda/filtro - Comentarios/notas - Control de la fuente - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de informes/análisis - Depuración - Detección de errores y problemas - Entorno de desarrollo integrado - Escaneo de código fuente - Escaneo multidioma - For Small Businesses - Gestión de comentarios - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión de tareas ## Integrations (13 total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Visual Studio Code ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos ## Categoría - [Herramientas de seguimiento de problemas](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de seguimiento de problemas](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) - [Sistemas de seguimiento de errores](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Herramientas de gestión de código fuente](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/1477/source-code-management/software) - [Software para desarrollo de apps](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/370/application-development/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos sin fines de lucro](https://www.getapp.cl/directory/2875/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Jira](https://www.getapp.cl/software/9953/jira) — 4.4/5 (15287 reviews) 2. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.getapp.cl/software/100377/microsoft-visual-studio-online) — 4.6/5 (3001 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.getapp.cl/software/112635/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1211 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.getapp.cl/software/91554/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1343 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.getapp.cl/software/106031/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2216 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Best code storage platform ever made" — 5.0/5 > **Pratik** | *2 de marzo de 2025* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is a one of the best platform to store the code and allow team members to work on same project simultaneously without having conflicts. > > **Puntos en contra**: As I used git hub to store my store far more there was no cons I got for it, It was very easy to learn just had little tricky to understand UI to resolve conflicts which issue was resolved in git desktop (application of git hub). > > I had great experience with Git hub which made my code easily available from any device, there was also in build deploy feature for static web application, It best and most recommended platform to learn. ----- ### "Github gets a thumbs up" — 5.0/5 > **Tony** | *22 de septiembre de 2025* | Software informático | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Having used git locally for quite some time, github seemed the natural progression. I've tried other systems (BitBucket and GitLab and many many years ago SourceSafe which wasnt online, it was a LAN based product). I used github prior to its purchase by Microsoft and was pleased to see that whereas previously private repo's needed a paid account, since Microsofts purchase, you can now have private repo's on their free service. Recently I've started getting into CI/CD and so have been getting involved in the Actions service, which gives you build time on their servers for deployment. I'd used AWS previously for CI/CD and found the Github actions were far easier to set up and they provide a reasonable amount of processor minutes per month for free which I haven't yet breached so it's a free service there too\! Not only is it a remote repository for tracking changes and allowing multiple people to develop in the same system, it also provides a remote offsite backup of your source. As far as value for money is concerned, its brilliant because it's free but even if you go for the paid option, the last time I checked it was about £7 a month > > **Puntos en contra**: The secret variables that you can create in actions are a "write once, never see them again" system. Variables can be used in Actions to control what you want the build script to do based on which branch you are in - ie one variable might be created for the master branch for live builds and another for staging or dev builds. I know they are secrets but sometimes it can be really helpful to check what the value is to try to debug what might be happening in the build process (even if you echo the value during the build process, most of the output is replaced with \*\*\*\*). It would be useful to require re-entry of username/password and 2fa details and to then be shown the details - even if each variable needed to go through the same process > > Overall its a good system, the best source control system I've used and whenever you search online for code, its github that tends to be the place other people use to store their open source contributions - you don't often see others being used, although I have seen GitLab more than anything else. ----- ### "Very Confusing to Use" — 2.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *24 de agosto de 2024* | Comercio minorista | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Nothing. I couldn't figure out how to use it. > > **Puntos en contra**: It was very confusing - once I logged in, I could go no further > > I was able to sign p easily, but after that I was totally lost ----- ### "Trustworthy repository hub of campaign technology." — 5.0/5 > **William** | *26 de diciembre de 2025* | Marketing y publicidad | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I also prefer the ease with which changes can be reviewed, actions can be triggered and everyone can be coordinated in situations that require quick approvals on the campaign. > > **Puntos en contra**: I do not like that first structure and approvals may bewilder other team members who are not technical and I tend to take them through the fundamentals. > > It has proved to be a reliable source of scripts, landing pages, and automation regarding our mobile campaigns without stalling the sales impetus. ----- ### "Great for Collaboration and Code Management" — 5.0/5 > **Bonface** | *3 de mayo de 2025* | Servicios financieros | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I like most about GitHub is how seamless it makes collaboration across development teams. The ability to track changes through version control, manage branches, and open pull requests has really helped us maintain clean and organized codebases. The GitHub Actions automation feature also saves a lot of time during deployment. It’s reliable and easy to integrate with other tools we already use. > > **Puntos en contra**: One thing that can be a bit confusing, especially for newer team members, is the learning curve with Git commands and how branching works. While the platform itself is great, it sometimes assumes a certain level of experience with version control, which can slow things down for beginners. Also, the notifications can get overwhelming if you’re watching multiple repositories. > > My experience with GitHub has been very positive overall. It’s a reliable platform for hosting code, managing projects, and collaborating with others. Whether I’m working solo or with a team, GitHub helps keep everything organized through issues, pull requests, and commits. Over time, it’s become a central part of my workflow, and it integrates well with other tools like VS Code and Slack. There’s a bit of a learning curve at the start, but once you get used to it, it really improves how you manage code. ----- Page: 1 / 247\ Siguiente: [Next page](https://www.getapp.cl/software/90537/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.cl/software/90537/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data