Opiniones de IntelliJ IDEA

Me ha encantado la compatibilidad para el control de versiones que ofrece, la depuración efectiva y el entorno de desarrollo completo de IntelliJ IDEA, así como su interfaz de edición intuitiva. Especialmente me gusta mucho el aspecto gráfico y lo sencillo de navegar que resulta IntelliJ IDEA.Además ofrece plugins, los cuales permiten personalizar y ajustar tu experiencia a la hora de desarrollar.

No tengo ninguna queja sobre el software. Sin embargo, me gustaría que fuese un poco más intuitivo el control de versiones integrado, pero esto no es demasiado importante dado a que el IDE también integra Git para el control de versiones.

This is the best tool for Java/Kotlin development. Every tool you could ever need is included. The syntax highlighting is very important and works amazingly well !

The software is very expensive, and the support isn't easy to reach (only public forums, no kind of chat/mail/phone support). Also, this software isn't beginner-friendly because many features are hidden in menus. It may take several months before being fully familiarized with the software.

It was an IDE that *somehow* filled the gap for AS3 / Flex / AIR developers after Flash Builder left the stage. With Moonshine not mature enough and Flash Developer being a rather unfriendly bunch of batch scripts that one would have to edit for things to kind-of-work, IntelliJ IDEA (plus the Flash/Flex/AIR plug-ins) stepped in to provide a solution, any solution at all.

I want to make it crystal clear that I mainly use IJ for AS3 / Flex / AIR development. I do not know whether its subpar behavior is rooted in those dedicated plugins. I did use IJ for developing some Node.js applications, and experience was a little better. But this review is ONLY about using IJ for AS3 / Flex / AIR development.

I very much dislike pretty everything, but the worst are:

- the build process: IJ does not do any work to ease SWC dependencies management; in a world where there are tools that analyze your code for imports and class instantiations and automatically match them against projects and libraries in your workspace (I build myself such a tool, it's name is SIRIUS and will be soon out on GitHub), IJ still wants you to add by hand 25+ dependencies.

- SDK handling: as any Flex/AIR developer knows, AIR SDKs have to be overlaid on FLEX SDKs and this alone is a source for countless problems; add on top that SDKs are often shipped in incomplete form (*.jar and *.swc files have to be salvaged from older SDKs) and you understand how being able to quickly patch / swap / tinker with an AIR/Flex SDK and test it's in working condition could save the day. IJ maintains some long-life caching of file listings in every SDK you throw at it; this makes it practically impossible to alter an existing SDK and have the changes reflected. The only workaround I have been able to find was to rename the SDK, add it as a new SDK, and remove the older one.

- indexi

CHAR LIMIT HIT.

I use this IDE for a variety of java programs that I have developed and continue to support. I love how easy it is to import different plugins and packages using the built-in features.

I don't believe I personally have anything to complain about. It is a solid IDE for many different development environments.

I really like how IntelliJ has a really nice interface and it looks really "clean". Classes are organized and it's really easy to use. Compared to other IDEs, it's appealing and many people I know use it daily.

One of the things I would change are the export options about IntelliJ. At least for me, I wish there were multiple options to export a project such as exporting it to ZIP file. I'm able to do by myself, but I wish IntelliJ would have it as a default option. I also wish you can zoom into the code easily (at least for Window users).

With all the plugins and features, IntelliJ is certainly easy to use and improves developer productivity.

Often I suspect it uses a lot of memory. This IDE can be made a little more lightweight and use less memory. Also, it takes up a lot of space for cache for dependencies. IntelliJ should clean up older gradle version caches, and older project dependency caches. This will save many GBs of hard disk space and improve the overall speed of the IDE and the computer itself.

Intellj idea is one of my favorite IDE because of the facts that they are so specific to technologies for example i am a python developer so they arranged a completely python loving environment for me and just like that for java etc and also that intellj idea provides you soo many good suggestions while you code that you save so much of your time and the development is quite fast which is needed to be fast. The suggestions it provides are accurate or near accurate.

I like everything except its UI and that is why i use other IDEs just because of it's user interface it does not looks like coders choice or atleast for me.

A very seamless development workflow is made possible by the design's inherent intelligence and efficiency, which extends to the construction, testing, debugging, and refactoring stages! In addition to offering a multitude of plugins that we can incorporate into the editor, it is jam-packed with capabilities.

The price is more expensive other wise the IntelliJ IDEA is best developing tool for application developers